A few years ago, my French husband Maxime and I went on holiday in the Dombes region of France, in the Ain.
On the second day of the trip, we were driving to the restaurant Maxime had selected for lunch when Maxime announced, 'This
is a gastronomic region!' and his eyes gleamed.
I looked at him, puzzled. 'I thought all of France was a gastronomic region.'
'No!' he said. 'The only true gastronomic regions are Alsace [of course, Alsace is Maxime’s home region], around Lyon [i.e., where we currently were] and the
South West.'
‘What about Paris?’
‘Pffff!’ Maxime pffffed.
‘And what about all those I dunno, cheeses in the north of France, and
Normandy's Isère butter and Champagne’s…um, champagne and – '
‘No no. In true gastronomic regions, the food and wine are
accessible, affordable - enjoyed by everyone – it’s democratic food.’
I thought about this for a while. 'OK ... so what’s this wonderful gastronomic region were in now famous for, then?'
'Frogs.'
'Oh.'
I felt a little crestfallen. Not truffles or brie then. Not even something edible.
Maxime explained that the whole region was full of man-made
ponds, and was hence famous for frogs' legs. The Dombes was frog central.
‘Well, quite frankly, I don’t think I’ll mind if the Dombes people don’t want to democratically share their frogs with me.’
But Maxime said, ‘I can’t wait to eat some!’ and his eyes shone even
brighter.
He was getting inordinately excited about frogs' legs, I
thought. But it can be amazing what foodstuffs can rouse the passions of
Europeans. They don’t just celebrate the births and ressurections of deities
but also hold fetes where they can worship snails, asparagus and particular
varieties of onion.
'But there’s so little meat on frogs,' I said. 'I mean why do you bother? Why not just eat chicken?'
'Because frogs' legs are thin,' Maxime said. 'When you fry them, you get this caramelised juice that you get at the
surface of a chicken wing. It’s like the chicken wing surface without any of the
boring stuff underneath.'
'Hmm,' I said, unconvinced.
At lunch, of course, Maxime ordered legs. I had actually seen frogs' legs before, at a gastronomic restaurant in Alsace. In that case, people were served a little leg with sauce. You could have almost pretended it was little bit of quail or
something, and that’s what I was expecting Maxime would be served now. But what the waiter brought out to us was a metal
platter piled high with stiff-looking V shapes. I leaned forward for a closer
look. And then I recoiled with a cry. The V shapes were whole cut-in-half frogs.
'Oh, that’s
appalling!' I exclaimed, trying and failing to not imagine someone cutting all
the little frogs in half. 'You can’t eat those! They’re too … froggy
looking.'
Not to mention the fact that in this case, Maxime'd be eating not just the legs but the
frog’s rude bits too.
No amount of
caramelisation could lull me into forgetting that I was eating a demi-frog, but
Maxime just said ‘mmmm’.
And it wasn’t just Maxime who loved frogs' legs. An Alsatian
friend of mine who liked to educate me in the culinary ways of Alsace talked once of the fabulousness of frogs’ legs:
'They're delicious,' Patrice said. 'Although in my Grandma’s
day, the legs were better.'
‘They were more shapely back then?’ I smiled.
‘No, no!’ said
Patrice, serious because it was a serious topic. ‘They were smaller - more
concentrated in flavour.'
I was doubtful
that strong frog flavour was a good thing, just quietly. But if you ever find
yourself in a suitably ‘democratic’ region of France, you can judge for yourself.